Robustness of the normal approximation of lead‐time demand in a distribution setting

John E. Tyworth and Liam O'Neill

Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 1997, vol. 44, issue 2, 165-186

Abstract: Previous studies criticize the general use of the normal approximation of lead‐time demand on the grounds that it can lead to serious errors in safety stock. We reexamine this issue for the distribution of fast‐moving finished goods. We first determine the optimal reorder points and quantities by using the classical normal‐approximation method and a theoretically correct procedure. We then evaluate the misspecification error of the normal approximation solution with respect to safety stock, logistics‐system costs, total costs (logistics costs, including acquisition costs), and fill rates. The results provide evidence that the normal approximation is robust with respect to both cost and service for seven major industry groups. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Naval Research Logistics 44: 165–186, 1997

Date: 1997
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (10)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6750(199703)44:23.0.CO;2-7

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:navres:v:44:y:1997:i:2:p:165-186

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Naval Research Logistics (NRL) from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().