Investigating the predictive validity of an emergency department mental health triage tool

Natisha Sands, Stephen Elsom, Michael Berk, Jennifer Hosking, Roshani Prematunga and Marie Gerdtz

Nursing & Health Sciences, 2014, vol. 16, issue 1, 11-18

Abstract: Emergency department mental health triage is a complex clinical task for which the evidence base is minimal. Research in the past decade has consistently identified issues associated with the accuracy and consistency of mental health triage assessment. In this study, we investigated the predictive validity of the clinical descriptors in the Victorian Emergency Department Mental Health Triage Tool. Using a naturalistic, retrospective study design, an audit of the emergency department triage database was undertaken on 12 months of continuous data for all mental health presentations (n = 1718). The main outcome measure was urgency categorization. The study findings indicate that triage nurses can accurately identify the urgency of mental health presentations using defined clinical criteria. A significant finding was that patients with acute psychotic symptoms were more likely to be triaged as high urgency (code 2); however, the Australasian Triage Scale, in use in all Australian and many international emergency departments, provides no mental health‐specific descriptors in high‐urgency categories (1 and 2).

Date: 2014
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12095

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:nuhsci:v:16:y:2014:i:1:p:11-18

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Nursing & Health Sciences from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().