Shocks and Coping Strategies in the Urban Squatter Settlements of San Salvador

Damien Échevin and Luis Tejerina

Poverty & Public Policy, 2013, vol. 5, issue 2, 180-202

Abstract: This article provides an assessment of shocks and coping strategies in the urban squatter settlements of San Salvador. Using a multi‐shocks household survey, it is shown that shocks like flooding, landslide, increase in food prices, insecurity, and illness or serious casualty prevail in these areas. Regression results show no significant effects of shocks on current consumption, which may indicate the existence of household consumption‐smoothing behavior. Hence, although coping responses to shocks may be efficient in the short term, covariate shocks may have adverse effects on well‐being in the longer run, especially if households decide to lower food, health, or education expenditures. Indeed, behavior‐based strategies appear to be very common when the shock is an increase in food prices, whereas assistance‐based strategies are more common when households are hit by flooding or landslide.

Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/pop4.27

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:povpop:v:5:y:2013:i:2:p:180-202

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Poverty & Public Policy from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().