The influence of the legislative and judicial branches on moral judgment and norm perception with the special case of judicial intervention

Maor Zeev‐Wolf and Avital Mentovich

Regulation & Governance, 2022, vol. 16, issue 4, 1211-1232

Abstract: This paper examines the capacity of the legislative and judicial branches to shift moral judgment in the direction of the law, when they assume complementary, or competing, normative stances. Participants were asked to rate the morality and social acceptability of ethically dubious behaviors that were either permitted, or prohibited, by the legislative or judicial branch. We found that (i) the legislative branch alters moral judgment in the direction of its legislation, such that conduct seems more moral when the law permits it; (ii) the capacity of the legislative branch to alter moral judgments is similar to that of the judicial branch; (iii) the influence of both branches on moral judgment stems from their ability to impact upon prevailing norms; (iv) disagreements between the branches weakens their ability to influence moral judgment and norm perception. Our findings suggest that both branches are powerful norm setters, involved in shaping people's moral values.

Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12404

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:reggov:v:16:y:2022:i:4:p:1211-1232

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Regulation & Governance from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().