Can economic liberalization and improved governance alter the defense–growth trade‐off?

Robert Looney and Robert M. McNab

Review of Financial Economics, 2008, vol. 17, issue 3, 172-182

Abstract: Because of the presumed guns vs. butter trade‐off, defense expenditures in developing countries are coming under increased scrutiny from the international lending agencies as well as key donors. As a result, defense expenditure cuts have often taken place despite rising security concerns. Empirically we find that developing countries may have more options than previously believed in their quest for adequate security and sustained economic growth. Specifically the main finding of the study is that key combinations of reforms and governance measures are likely to exist and are capable of neutralizing many of the adverse economic effects often associated with defense expenditures. The key is to coordinate economic liberalization and governance reforms in the civilian sector with the requirements for improved security in the defense sector.

Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rfe.2007.02.008

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:revfec:v:17:y:2008:i:3:p:172-182

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Review of Financial Economics from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().