Bank secrecy in offshore centres and capital flows: Does blacklisting matter?

Olga Balakina, Angelo D’Andrea and Donato Masciandaro ()

Review of Financial Economics, 2017, vol. 32, issue 1, 30-57

Abstract: This study analyses cross‐border capital flows in order to verify the existence and direction of the effect of the soft regulation promoted by international organizations against banking secrecy which characterized the so called tax and financial heavens. This effect is called in the literature Stigma Effect, but both the existence and the direction of the stigma effect are far from being obvious. The international capital flows can simply neglect the relevance of the blacklisting, or worst, the attractiveness of banking secrecy can produce a race to the bottom: the desire to elude more transparent regulation can sensibly influence the capital movements. We test whether being included and later excluded from the FATF blacklist is an effective measure that influences countries’ cross‐border capital flows. Using annual panel data for the period 1996–2014, we apply our framework to 126 countries worldwide. We find evidence that in general the stigma effect does not exist.

Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rfe.2016.09.005

Related works:
Journal Article: Bank secrecy in offshore centres and capital flows: Does blacklisting matter? (2017)
Working Paper: Bank Secrecy in Offshore Centres and Capital Flows: Does Blacklisting Matter? (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:revfec:v:32:y:2017:i:1:p:30-57

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Review of Financial Economics from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().