Paradoxes of design: energy and water consumption and the aestheticization of Norwegian bathrooms 1990-2008

Thomas Berker and Helen Jøsok Gansmo
Additional contact information
Thomas Berker: Department of Interdisciplinary Studies of Culture, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway, Postal: Department of Interdisciplinary Studies of Culture, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
Helen Jøsok Gansmo: Department of Interdisciplinary Studies of Culture, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway, Postal: Department of Interdisciplinary Studies of Culture, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway

Sustainable Development, 2010, vol. 18, issue 3, 135-149

Abstract: In this article we explore the widely held assumption that aestheticized consumption is bound to escalate. In our study of 20 years of representations of bathrooms in Norway's most popular interior design magazine Bonytt , we found support for the hypothesis that since the early 1990s new uses of bathrooms as sites for the construction and expression of identity and social aspirations have become more salient. We also have reason to believe that these new uses may be related to increased energy and water consumption. However, we also encountered aspects that indicate a more contingent and paradoxical relation. First, Bonytt calls explicitly for reflexive consumerism, enabling readers to deliberate the degree of aestheticization of their bathrooms. Second, while mostly showing large bathrooms, ' aesthetic fixes ' are proposed by Bonytt , which let small bathrooms appear larger - without increased energy consumption for space heating. Third, aesthetics is used to propagate new, energy saving technologies (e.g. LEDs). And fourth, water and energy wasting practices shown in newer Bonytt issues (e.g. large shower heads) have largely replaced wasteful practices present in older issues (e.g. whirlpools). Thus, at least in these cases the shifts in fashions promoted by Bonytt may only be surface phenomena, which leave more fundamental trends untouched. These four observations are examples of how a productive relation between design and sustainability can be achieved. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/sd.454 Link to full text; subscription required (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:18:y:2010:i:3:p:135-149

DOI: 10.1002/sd.454

Access Statistics for this article

Sustainable Development is currently edited by Richard Welford

More articles in Sustainable Development from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().