EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Third Annual Logistics Faculty Salary Survey

Ila Manuj, Atefeh Yazdanparast, M. Theodore Farris and Jerry W. Wilson

Transportation Journal, 2010, vol. 49, issue 4, 52-60

Abstract: While the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB) International conducts an annual survey of business school faculty and administrative salaries, the report does not specify salary figures for logistics (and related areas such as supply chain management) faculty. Since the growth in the number of logistics faculty positions has continued to exceed the output of doctoral programs in the field for more than a decade, it is logical to assume that logistics faculty salaries, at all levels, are increasing. However, without factual data, questions such as what salary should a new logistics Ph. D. expect and what should an administrator budget for a logistics faculty position cannot be answered satisfactorily. Moreover, most people expect and want to be adequately compensated. However, for the specific discipline of logistics and supply chain management (SCM), the data on average compensation across different ranks, institutions, and other such factors are not available. To provide such factual data, the authors have developed a survey to annually collect data on logistics and supply chain faculty salaries. This year's survey was the third one in the past four years.

Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.2307/40904914

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wly:transj:v:49:y:2010:i:4:p:52-60

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Transportation Journal from John Wiley & Sons
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:49:y:2010:i:4:p:52-60