Are Preferences for Structured Settlements Consistent with the Loss†Minimization Objective of Tort Law?

Patricia Born and Robert Puelz

Journal of Insurance Issues, 2016, vol. 39, issue 2, 113-136

Abstract: In this paper, we test several hypotheses developed from a theory of structured settlements under the loss†minimization objective of tort law with a large sample of liability insured, closed claim data from the state of Texas. Our findings indicate support for the hypothesis that structured settlements are more likely utilized when longevity risk is higher and the predictability of future needs is more uncertain. We find that higher damages are associated with a higher likelihood of structured settlement payouts, which is supportive of a wealth effect concern. Further, we find that a larger share of economic damages, relative to total damages, are associated with a higher likelihood of a lump†sum settlement, consistent with the prediction of matching risk.

Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://search.proquest.com (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wri:journl:v:39:y:2016:i:2:p:113-136

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Insurance Issues is currently edited by James Barrese

More articles in Journal of Insurance Issues from Western Risk and Insurance Association
Bibliographic data for series maintained by James Barrese ().