ENHANCING CONSENSUS UNDER OPINION BIAS BY MEANS OF HIERARCHICAL DECISION MAKING
Nicolas Perony (),
René Pfitzner (),
Ingo Scholtes (),
Claudio J. Tessone and
Frank Schweitzer
Additional contact information
Nicolas Perony: ETH Zurich, Chair of Systems Design, Weinbergstrasse 56/58, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
René Pfitzner: ETH Zurich, Chair of Systems Design, Weinbergstrasse 56/58, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Ingo Scholtes: ETH Zurich, Chair of Systems Design, Weinbergstrasse 56/58, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Claudio J. Tessone: ETH Zurich, Chair of Systems Design, Weinbergstrasse 56/58, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), 2013, vol. 16, issue 06, 1-15
Abstract:
We study the role of hierarchical structures in a simple model of collective consensus formation based on the bounded confidence model with continuous individual opinions. For the particular variation of this model considered in this paper, we assume that a bias toward an extreme opinion is introduced whenever two individuals interact and form a common decision. As a simple proxy for hierarchical social structures, we introduce a two-step decision making process in which in the second step groups of like-minded individuals are replaced by representatives once they have reached local consensus, and the representatives in turn form a collective decision in a downstream process. We find that the introduction of such a hierarchical decision making structure can improve consensus formation, in the sense that the eventual collective opinion is closer to the true average of individual opinions than without it. In particular, we numerically study how the size of groups of like-minded individuals being represented by delegate individuals affects the impact of the bias on the final population-wide consensus. These results are of interest for the design of organizational policies and the optimization of hierarchical structures in the context of group decision making.
Keywords: Opinion dynamics; consensus formation; bounded confidence; hierarchical organizations; opinion bias (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219525913500203
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:acsxxx:v:16:y:2013:i:06:n:s0219525913500203
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
DOI: 10.1142/S0219525913500203
Access Statistics for this article
Advances in Complex Systems (ACS) is currently edited by Frank Schweitzer
More articles in Advances in Complex Systems (ACS) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().