Development Lessons for Asia from Non-Asian Countries

Dani Rodrik

Asian Development Review (ADR), 2006, vol. 23, issue 01, 1-15

Abstract: The disappointments of the Washington Consensus have led to the search for a new paradigm to replace it. The chief failing of the Washington Consensus was that it represented an approach based on “rules of thumb.†As such it was not well grounded either in economic theory or in the reality of actual countries. I discuss several strands of new thinking that have appeared following the demise of the Washington Consensus, and argue in favor of an explicitly diagnostic approach.

Date: 2006
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0116110506000017
Open Access

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:adrxxx:v:23:y:2006:i:01:n:s0116110506000017

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

DOI: 10.1142/S0116110506000017

Access Statistics for this article

Asian Development Review (ADR) is currently edited by Tetsushi Sonobe

More articles in Asian Development Review (ADR) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().