MARKET EFFICIENCY IN G-20 COUNTRIES: THE PARADOX OF FINANCIAL CRISIS

João Paulo Vieito (), K.V. Murthy () and Vanita Tripathi ()
Additional contact information
João Paulo Vieito: School of Business Studies, Polytechnic Institute of Viana do Castelo, Avenida Miguel Dantas, 4930 Valença, Portugal

Annals of Financial Economics (AFE), 2013, vol. 08, issue 01, 1-27

Abstract: This paper is amongst the first to investigate weak-form efficiency of the most developed (G-20) countries in the world. It also measures the impact of the 2007 financial crisis on the stock markets of these countries, in terms of their efficiency. Serial correlation test, ADF unit root test, Lo and MacKinlay (1988) variance ratio test, Chow and Denning (1993) RWH test and Wrights' 2000 ranks and signs based multiple variance ratio test were utilized to carry out this analysis. The entire study period was divided into a pre-crisis period (January 1, 2005 – August 8, 2007) and a during crisis period (August 9, 2007 – Deccember 31, 2011). Strong contemporaneous effects emerged across all international markets (except Saudi Arabia) as a consequence of the 2007 crisis. This may be due to increased international intra-day activity across the world markets. It was concluded that the "Samuelson dictum," which states that "while individual stocks are efficient, the market index is inefficient," seems to hold good on a global level by analogy. This is evident on the premise that, on the whole the 2007 crisis reduced return and increased volatility, even though individual markets became more efficient. The most robust result from the analysis is that most of the individual markets are weak-form efficient. Following the crisis of 2007, the methodology used indicates that on the whole, the market efficiency of individual stock markets improved.Hence, during the pre-crisis, volatility was low but heteroskedastic. However, during the period of the crisis, volatility was high but homoscedastic. The heightened volatility and low return that are a consequence of the crisis coupled with improved market efficiency, due to market vigil and control, ensure that abnormal returns and persistent arbitrage possibilities are wiped out. This appears to be a paradox of a crisis.

Keywords: Market efficiency; G-20; financial crises; pre-crisis; during crisis; Samuelson dictum; heteroskedastic; homoscedastic; G11; G14; G15; F36 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S2010495213500036
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:afexxx:v:08:y:2013:i:01:n:s2010495213500036

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

DOI: 10.1142/S2010495213500036

Access Statistics for this article

Annals of Financial Economics (AFE) is currently edited by Michael McAleer

More articles in Annals of Financial Economics (AFE) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().