Systemic Governance of Mountains, Rivers, Forests, Farmlands, Lakes and Grasslands: Theoretical Framework and Approaches

Yan Zheng and Guiyang Zhuang
Additional contact information
Yan Zheng: University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, No. 11 Changyu Street, Fangshan District, Beijing 102488, China2Research Institute for Eco-Civilization, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, No. 27 Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District Beijing 100710, China
Guiyang Zhuang: University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, No. 11 Changyu Street, Fangshan District, Beijing 102488, China2Research Institute for Eco-Civilization, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, No. 27 Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District Beijing 100710, China

Chinese Journal of Urban and Environmental Studies (CJUES), 2021, vol. 09, issue 04, 1-21

Abstract: The life community of mountains, rivers, forests, farmlands, lakes and grasslands (MRFFLG) and its systemic governance are key components to build ecological civilization in China. It comprises diverse connotations in value, scientific and economic dimensions. Epistemologically, it comes from the Chinese traditional philosophy of harmonious coexistence of heaven, earth and man, and conforms to the Western ecological ethics, complex system science and environmental value theory. Methodologically, as a complex socio-ecological system in which man and nature interact and coexist, the life community of the MRFFLG should be governed coordinately from both narrow and broad views. At the policy level, from the perspectives of narrow synergy among ecological subsystems and broad synergy among the complex socio-ecological system, this paper evaluates the performance indicators of 16 pilot projects of the MRFFLG, and points out that the design of most pilot projects well reflects the narrow synergy of multiple ecological elements, but is short of attention to the broad synergy of green development and ecological civilization. There are two practical ways to promote the systemic governance of the MRFFLG. First, it needs to focus on the coordinated governance of watershed and ecological environment restoration against the background of global climate and environmental change. The goal is to restore and improve the service functions of ecological subsystems and enhance their climate adaptability. Second, in the context of new urbanization and green development transition, it requires a collaborative planning focusing on natural capital and green infrastructure investment, which is aimed at cultivating ecological dividends and realizing ecological economy.

Keywords: Ecological civilization; the life community of mountains; rivers; forests; farmlands; lakes and grasslands; systemic governance; complex socio-ecological system; synergy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S2345748121500214
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:cjuesx:v:09:y:2021:i:04:n:s2345748121500214

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

DOI: 10.1142/S2345748121500214

Access Statistics for this article

Chinese Journal of Urban and Environmental Studies (CJUES) is currently edited by PAN Jiahua

More articles in Chinese Journal of Urban and Environmental Studies (CJUES) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().