Market Exit and Minimax Regret

Gisèle Umbhauer ()
Additional contact information
Gisèle Umbhauer: BETA (Bureau d’Economie Théorique et Appliquée), University of Strasbourg, 61 Avenue de la Forêt Noire, 67085 Strasbourg, France

International Game Theory Review (IGTR), 2022, vol. 24, issue 04, 1-34

Abstract: This paper shows how minimax regret sheds new light on an old economic topic, market-exit games. It focuses on wars of attrition, namely overcrowded duopoly markets where the strategic variable is the exit time. The only symmetric Nash equilibrium (NE) of the game studied is a mixed-strategy equilibrium that leads to a null expected payoff, i.e., the payoff a firm gets when it immediately exits the market. This result is not convincing, both from a behavioral and from a strategic viewpoint. The minimax regret approach that builds upon opposite regrets — exiting the market too late and exiting the market too early — is more convincing and ensures that both firms obtain a strictly positive expected payoff.Highlights Minimax regret behavior sheds new light on the optimal exit-times in overcrowded markets. Minimax regret behavior provides a new behavioral content to mixed strategies. In overcrowded duopolies, if the firms’ aim consists in minimizing regrets, then they get better payoffs than in the mixed-strategy NE.

Keywords: War of attrition; minimax regret; mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium; maximin payoff; overcrowded market (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S021919892250013X
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:igtrxx:v:24:y:2022:i:04:n:s021919892250013x

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

DOI: 10.1142/S021919892250013X

Access Statistics for this article

International Game Theory Review (IGTR) is currently edited by David W K Yeung

More articles in International Game Theory Review (IGTR) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().