Effects of Imprecise Cognitive Biases and Free-Riding on the Pricing Decisions of Dual-Channel Supply Chain Members
Sanchari Ganguly,
Pritha Das () and
Manoranjan Maiti ()
Additional contact information
Sanchari Ganguly: Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur Howrah 711103, West Bengal, India
Pritha Das: Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur Howrah 711103, West Bengal, India
Manoranjan Maiti: ��Department of Applied Mathematics with Oceanology and Computer Programming, Vidyasagar University, Midnapore 721102, West Bengal, India
International Game Theory Review (IGTR), 2024, vol. 26, issue 04, 1-53
Abstract:
Nowadays, to cater the increasing green customers, firms have switched to green manufacturing. In a dual-channel green supply chain (DCGSC), customers experience products at offline stores and buy them online (free-riding). Often imprecise cognitive biases (“fairness concern†and “overconfidence†) are observed among the supply chain (SC) members. With these facts, this study introduces the free-riding and above cognitive biases in a DCGSC with a manufacturer selling a green product through own online and offline retail channels and examines their effects. A centralized and four decentralized models (for green and nongreen products) are formulated depending upon channel members’ cognitive biases individually and jointly with and without free-riding. The fuzzy objectives and constraints are made deterministic using expectation and possibility measures, respectively. Models are solved and illustrated numerically. The results indicate that free-riding is harmful and beneficial to retailer and manufacturer, respectively. Manufacturer’s overconfidence enhances the retailer’s profit but decreases or increases own profit depending upon the salvage value. Retailer’s fairness concern is catastrophic for manufacturer but beneficial for her. Product greening increases manufacturer’s profit than the carbon tax regulation for lower emissions. In addition to above observations, for maximum profit, management should not go for greening beyond an optimum level.
Keywords: Game theory; fuzzy theory; free-riding; fairness; overconfidence; green supply chain (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219198924500075
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:igtrxx:v:26:y:2024:i:04:n:s0219198924500075
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
DOI: 10.1142/S0219198924500075
Access Statistics for this article
International Game Theory Review (IGTR) is currently edited by David W K Yeung
More articles in International Game Theory Review (IGTR) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().