Sustainable Supplier Evaluation in an Automotive Company Using Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods
Tuğçe Şişman (),
Sinem Büyüksaatçi Kiriş and
Dilek Yilmaz ()
Additional contact information
Tuğçe Şişman: Department of Industrial Engineering, Piri Reis University, Tuzla-İstanbul, 34940, Turkey
Sinem Büyüksaatçi Kiriş: Department of Industrial Engineering, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Avcılar-İstanbul, 34320, Turkey
Dilek Yilmaz: Department of Industrial Engineering, İstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Avcılar-İstanbul, 34320, Turkey
International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), 2025, vol. 24, issue 02, 535-581
Abstract:
Sustainable supplier management literature is mainly on sustainable supplier selection but sustainable supplier performance monitoring & evaluation studies are scarce. Furthermore, the studies do not differentiate the sustainability evaluation criteria between the supplier selection and monitoring & evaluation stages. To bridge this gap, this study aimed to monitor & evaluate sustainability performance of the suppliers of a focal manufacturing company in automotive sector with the TBL approach. Toward that end, we questioned and tried to identify first the sustainable supplier selection and monitoring & evaluation differentiating criteria, and then, how we can rank and rate the sustainable suppliers for developmental purposes in the monitoring & evaluation phase. 21 criteria were determined for sustainable supplier performance in monitoring & evaluation by a detailed literature review and taking the opinions of the focal company. Then, decision makers assessed sustainability dimensions and determined criteria related to these dimensions. The weights of dimensions and criteria were calculated by Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy AHP method. Then, sustainability performances of selected suppliers from the focal company’s portfolio were ranked by using Fuzzy EDAS, Fuzzy CODAS and Fuzzy MOORA methods. The results show that sustainable supplier monitoring & evaluation criteria involve a mix of external criteria (rules and regulations) and internal criteria (suppliers’ values). This finding helps us understand how we can have a more relaxed criteria set involving basic external criteria while selecting suppliers to have access to a more innovative and diverse supplier space and then have more challenging internal and external criteria to monitor & evaluate those suppliers toward true sustainability.
Keywords: Triple bottom line; sustainable supplier evaluation; fuzzy logic; multi-criteria decision making (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219622022500833
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:ijitdm:v:24:y:2025:i:02:n:s0219622022500833
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
DOI: 10.1142/S0219622022500833
Access Statistics for this article
International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM) is currently edited by Yong Shi
More articles in International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().