EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Enhancing Interestingness Evaluation in Ontology-Based Association Rules: A Case Study on US Birth Data

C B Abhilash and Kavi Mahesh
Additional contact information
C B Abhilash: Department of Computer Science and Engineering, JSS Academy of Technical Education Bengaluru, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560060, India
Kavi Mahesh: Department of Computer Science and Engineering, RNS Institute of Technology, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560060, India

International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), 2025, vol. 24, issue 07, 2139-2162

Abstract: In the domain of association rule mining, evaluating the interestingness of discovered rules plays a crucial role in extracting meaningful patterns. However, the context of interestingness poses challenges that call for improvements in rule evaluation. This study focuses on addressing this problem by enhancing the evaluation of interestingness in ontology-based association rules. In this study, we present the effective rule evaluation using the ontology (EREO) model, which aims to evaluate the interestingness of ontology-based association rules in the context of US birth data. The EREO model incorporates three levels of rule evaluation: the utilization of proposed effective measures, consultation with domain experts, and the utilization of AI-based methods. To indirectly evaluate the interestingness of ontology-based rules, we propose two effective measures: Ontology-based rule specificity (ORS) and ontology-based rule complexity (ORC). Rule evaluation is further facilitated by domain experts and AI-based methods, employing an interestingness measurement scale (IMS). Furthermore, we compare the average interestingness scores obtained from ORS, ORC, and the EREO model with those derived from traditional interestingness measures. Our findings demonstrate that the proposed interestingness measures consistently outperform the traditional ones, as indicated by higher average scores. Additionally, we observe a positive relationship between the interestingness scores obtained using the three levels of the EREO model. Overall, this study effectively showcases the efficacy of ontology-based association rule evaluation in improving the quality of discovered rules and supporting informed decision-making processes.

Keywords: Association rule mining; ontologies; rule evaluation; US birth data; effective measures; AI-based methods; interestingness measurement scale (IMS); decision-making (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219622025500324
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:ijitdm:v:24:y:2025:i:07:n:s0219622025500324

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

DOI: 10.1142/S0219622025500324

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM) is currently edited by Yong Shi

More articles in International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().

 
Page updated 2025-09-06
Handle: RePEc:wsi:ijitdm:v:24:y:2025:i:07:n:s0219622025500324