EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A CONTINUOUS-TIME REEXAMINATION OF DOLLAR-COST AVERAGING

Moshe Milevsky and Steven E. Posner ()
Additional contact information
Steven E. Posner: Goldman, Sachs & Co., 85 Broad Street, New York, NY 10004, USA

International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), 2003, vol. 06, issue 02, 173-194

Abstract: The widespread practice of dollar-cost averaging (DCA) amongst the investing public, has puzzled most financial economists, ever since Constantinides [2] demonstrated the dynamic inefficiency of this strategy under very general conditions. This enduring phenomena has forced researchers, such as Statman [12], to suggest behavioral explanations for DCA's popularity, predicated on the prospect theory of Kahneman and Tversky [4].In this paper we reexamine the payoff structure of DCA via continuous-time financial mathematics and then ask the question:Is it possible to reconcile the theory and practice of dollar-cost averaging?To answer this question, we take a slightly different approach to the issue by using the tools of stochastic calculus and Brownian bridges. We demonstrate that engaging in a dollar-cost averaging strategy is akin to purchasing a zero strike arithmetic Asian option on the underlying security. In other words, people who engage in dollar-cost averaging are implicitly purchasing a path-dependent contingent claim. We then prove that the expected return from this exotic option — i.e. the DCA strategy — conditional on knowing the final value of the security will uniformlyexceedthe return from the underlying security for all sufficiently large volatilities.This leads us to argue that investorsmay bedollar-cost averaging because they have "target prices" for the underlying asset price. The strategy of dollar-cost averaging would then exceed the returns from lump-sum investing, based on their subjective conditional expectation. In fact, the more volatile the underlying security, the greater is the benefit to dollar-cost averaging — conditional on knowing the final value — which is consistent with common practice.

Keywords: Investments; portfolio theory; Brownian bridges (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2003
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219024903001888
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:ijtafx:v:06:y:2003:i:02:n:s0219024903001888

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

DOI: 10.1142/S0219024903001888

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF) is currently edited by L P Hughston

More articles in International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:wsi:ijtafx:v:06:y:2003:i:02:n:s0219024903001888