EVALUATION OF CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT INFRIENDS OF THE WEST COUNTRY ASSOCIATIONv.CANADAAND LAND USE PLANNING ALTERNATIVES

Kate M. Lindsay (), Clark P. Svrcek and Daniel W. Smith
Additional contact information
Kate M. Lindsay: Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, 304 Environmental Engineering Building, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2M8, Canada
Clark P. Svrcek: Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, 304 Environmental Engineering Building, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2M8, Canada
Daniel W. Smith: Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, 304 Environmental Engineering Building, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2M8, Canada

Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), 2002, vol. 04, issue 02, 151-169

Abstract: In 1994, Sunpine Forest Products Ltd. sought permits from Alberta government to construct a permanent log hauling road and approvals from the federal government for construction of required bridges associated with the road. A concerned citizens group challenged the Federal Government's subsequent bridge approvals in court, claiming that cumulative effects assessment was not adequately conducted underCanadian Environmental Assessment Act. The originalSunpinecourt decision agreed with the citizen group that the federal government erred in law by not including related projects and adequately considering associated cumulative effects, sending the approval back to the federal government for reconsideration. Government regulators, industrial foresters, and environmental groups across Canada awaited the appeal to theSunpinefederal court decision. TheSunpine Appealreversed the original position with much relief from industry and government. TheSunpinecase raises important issues about how federal and provincial authorities address environmental impacts, uncertainty in scoping assessments, factors to be considered, and cumulative effect assessments. This paper evaluates the cumulative effects assessment processes followed in theSunpinecase study under theCanadian Environmental Assessment Actwithin an analysis framework of comprehensiveness, fairness, efficiency, and effectiveness. Land use planning models, like the British Columbia land resource management plans andMackenzie Valley Resource Management Act, offer alternative approaches to legislated cumulative effects processes. Sustainability may be better realised with a combination of strategic environmental assessment tools, utilising environmental assessment at the project-level within the context of a regional resource planning process.

Keywords: Cumulative effects assessment; land use planning; strategic environmental assessment; environmental assessment legislation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2002
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S146433320200098X
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:jeapmx:v:04:y:2002:i:02:n:s146433320200098x

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

DOI: 10.1142/S146433320200098X

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM) is currently edited by Thomas Fischer

More articles in Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().