RADIOFREQUENCY RADIATION FROM TRANSMITTER SITES: FACTORS AFFECTING ACCEPTABILITY OF RISK AND PROTECTION STANDARDS

Ivan L. Beale (), Sandra A. Heriot, Kathryn A. Murrell and Keith J. Petrie
Additional contact information
Ivan L. Beale: University of Auckland, Department of Psychology, New Zealand
Sandra A. Heriot: Department of Psychological Medicine, Children's Hospital at Westmead/University of Sydney, Australia
Kathryn A. Murrell: Department of Psychology, University of Auckland, New Zealand
Keith J. Petrie: Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, University of Auckland, New Zealand

Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), 2002, vol. 04, issue 04, 449-463

Abstract: Although there is widespread concern about public exposure to radiation from cellphone relay stations, there have been no systematic studies of psychosocial factors affecting public attitudes and beliefs. This paper reports on an analysis of the responses of 105 adults to a questionnaire about their preferences between different standards for exposure to radiation from cellular telephone relay stations and other radiofrequency transmitters. Participants demonstrated clear preference for a more-restrictive (all-effects) protection standard over a less-restrictive (thermal) standard. This preference was not influenced by whether or not participants were personally at risk, or by consideration of costs to industry. Most participants opting initially for an all-effects standard did not shift their preference in the face of substantial hypothetical increases in personal monetary cost. On the other hand, the balance of preference between the two standards was significantly influenced by factors such as the attitude towards the responsibilities of industry, perceptions of possible existing health effects on household members, and self-estimated distance of participants' residences from a transmitter.

Keywords: Cellphone relay stations, radiofrequency radiation, acceptable risk, social construction of risk; , technological risk, risk assessment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2002
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S1464333202001133
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:jeapmx:v:04:y:2002:i:04:n:s1464333202001133

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

DOI: 10.1142/S1464333202001133

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM) is currently edited by Thomas Fischer

More articles in Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().