A HOLARCHICAL MODEL FOR REGIONAL SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT

Herrera Rodrigo Jiliberto ()
Additional contact information
Herrera Rodrigo Jiliberto: TAU Environmental Consulting, Santa Matilde 4, 28014 Madrid, España, Spain

Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), 2004, vol. 06, issue 04, 511-538

Abstract: This paper is an attempt to develop a holarchical paradigm for regional sustainability assessment based on a critic of the epistemology of sustainability, seen as between two polar opposites that make up a unified system.On the one hand we find what can be described as a representationalist view, for which sustainability is the result of juxtaposing certain economic, social and environmental aspects of reality. However, complexity and uncertainty are the most relevant epistemological results of trying to define sustainability as an "objective" entity derived from an analytical perspective.On the other hand, complexity and uncertainty lead to the conclusion that sustainability cannot be expressed and, therefore, the problem of what to do does not depend so much on the description of the object we want to act on, but onhowwe decide what to do. This is the procedural epistemology of sustainability.The methodological and epistemological proposal that has guided the development of the Sustainable Development Strategy for the Region of Murcia, for instance, is equidistant from these two options. It is based on the belief that it is necessary and possible to constitute sustainability as an analytically coherent (i.e. non-arbitrary) object of knowledge, which is at the same time autonomous from the analytical–fragmentary descriptions that comprise standard scientific knowledge. In the centre of this epistemology is a systemic understanding of "reality" that tries to grasp the hierarchical inter-existence of the outer world, and focuses primarily on contingent management from a dynamic viewpoint rather than that of certainty.This epistemological dual perspective has many implications for evaluation practice, both in the framing of technical analysis, and in the management of social participation.

Keywords: Regional substainability assessment; epistemology of sustainability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S1464333204001833
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:jeapmx:v:06:y:2004:i:04:n:s1464333204001833

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

DOI: 10.1142/S1464333204001833

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM) is currently edited by Thomas Fischer

More articles in Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().