SCREENING DECISIONS CONCERNING THE LIKELY IMPACTS OF PLANS AND PROJECTS ON NATURA 2000 SITES

Kaja Peterson (), Mati Kose () and Meelis Uustal ()
Additional contact information
Kaja Peterson: Stockholm Environment Institute Tallinn Centre, Tallinn, Estonia;
Mati Kose: Pärnu College, Tartu University, Estonia
Meelis Uustal: Stockholm Environment Institute Tallinn Center, Tallin, Estonia

Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), 2010, vol. 12, issue 02, 185-214

Abstract: Screening is a crucial stage in the environmental assessment process, because by this process a decision is made whether or not further assessment of a plan or project is required, and by doing so, the likelihood of implementing plans and projects harming the environment is to be decreased. In the Habitats Directive, it is explicitly stated that the competent authority should ascertain that no harm will be done to EU sites belonging to the Natura 2000 network before authorisation for further action is granted. A review of some of the national guidance documents concerning the Natura Assessment developed by EU Member States showed diversity in the scope and depth prescribed for the assessment. A five-year review of screening decisions in Estonia demonstrated that the Habitats Directive and the respective EU guidelines are poorly applied. The majority of the EIA and SEA screening decisions in 2004–2009 did not consider the impacts on Natura 2000 sites. Those decisions that did consider them addressed primarily the location-induced aspects of the proposed plan or project, with respect to the location of the relevant Natura 2000 site. Less than one third of decisions considered location, likely effects and their significance together. In the rest of the cases, the reasoning was missing or unclear. Since the study demonstrated important deficiencies in the screening stage of the Natura Assessment, the Estonian EIA Act urgently needs to be modified to comply fully with the requirements of the Habitats Directive and to ensure that the conservation objectives of nearly 600 Estonian Natura 200 sites are not compromised.

Keywords: Screening; appropriate assessment; Habitats Directive; Birds Directive; Natura 2000; significance of impact; Estonia (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S1464333210003553
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:jeapmx:v:12:y:2010:i:02:n:s1464333210003553

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

DOI: 10.1142/S1464333210003553

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM) is currently edited by Thomas Fischer

More articles in Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().