BETWEEN GOVERNANCE AND GOVERNMENT: DANISH EIA IN UNCHARTED WATERS

Per Christensen, Lone Kørnøv () and Eskild Holm Nielsen
Additional contact information
Per Christensen: The Danish Center for Environmental Assessment, Department of Development and Planning, Aalborg University, Skibbrogade 5.1, B9000 Aalborg, Denmark
Lone Kørnøv: The Danish Center for Environmental Assessment, Department of Development and Planning, Aalborg University, Skibbrogade 5.1, B9000 Aalborg, Denmark
Eskild Holm Nielsen: The Danish Center for Environmental Assessment, Department of Development and Planning, Aalborg University, Skibbrogade 5.1, B9000 Aalborg, Denmark

Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), 2012, vol. 14, issue 04, 1-18

Abstract: Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) has now passed its first 25 years and looking back it becomes clear that it has changed its direction. In this article we will look closer at how different pressures have pushed it in the direction of decentralisation and deliberative democracy, while other forces have pushed it in the direction of more centralised, top-down government. Different developments during this period can thus be perceived as in accordance with a system of governance based upon framework legislation and characterised by flexibility, coordination and participation. Reflecting on some of the manifest developments encountered in Danish EIA legislation, this article shows that the development of governance structures is followed by developments in the direction of more government. By studying EIA screenings of livestock projects, which is the dominating Danish EIA practice, it becomes obvious that governance as well as government has changed its role often at one and the same time. Although there was scepticism about the efficacy of the EIA instrument at the beginning, this changed from the mid-1990s primarily because it was realised, that EIA screening could address the overwhelming problem of agricultural production, but also that it opened the door for more public participation and broader assessment of projects than found previously under environmental regulation. This can be interpreted as an example of a shift away from government to governance, but the story turns out to be more complex than that as the opposite trend is also encountered. In our empirical work on EIA screening in Denmark, we find that two major changes have taken place. These changes all relate to the problem of livestock production. In all cases, we find that the way EIA is used in Denmark is innovative, but also that pressure from the newly introduced Natura 2000 as well as the Water Framework Directive increases the pressure to return to more traditional top-down measures. Using these examples, this paper offers important insights into the dynamic between governance and government.

Keywords: EIA; EIA screening; governance; government; Habitats Directive; Livestock; Water Framework Directive (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S1464333212500214
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:jeapmx:v:14:y:2012:i:04:n:s1464333212500214

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

DOI: 10.1142/S1464333212500214

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM) is currently edited by Thomas Fischer

More articles in Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().