Re-Examining the Rationale for Strategic Assessment: An Evaluation of Purpose in Two Systems
Samuel J. Hayes,
Adam Barker () and
Carys E Jones ()
Additional contact information
Samuel J. Hayes: Department of Geography and Planning, School of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool, Roxby Building, 74 Bedford Street South, Liverpool, L69 72T, UK
Adam Barker: Department of Planning & Environmental Management, School of Environment, Education and Development, University of Manchester, Humanities Bridgeford Street Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL UK
Carys E Jones: Department of Planning & Environmental Management, School of Environment, Education and Development, University of Manchester, Humanities Bridgeford Street Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL UK
Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), 2017, vol. 19, issue 04, 1-26
Abstract:
Strategic forms of impact assessment have seen increased application around the world since their conception. Expansion has produced considerable variation and this range of tools and processes can create practitioner confusion and blurred boundaries in practice. This research draws on empirical data from England and Scotland to examine different systems to understand how the purposes of strategic assessment are framed and to consider how purposes are translated into practice. Four key purposes of strategic assessment are examined; overcoming EIA shortcomings, strategic thinking, representation of the environment and consideration of sustainability. It is concluded that various scales (international, national, local and individual) influence how strategic assessment purpose is framed. We find that as multiple purposes come together they interact, with regulatory compliance potentially dominating. Strategic assessment is also found to be described as information provider, and excluded or distant from strategic thinking as part of plan formulation.
Keywords: Strategic environmental assessment; sustainability appraisal; sustainability assessment; impact assessment; sustainability; sustainable development (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S146433321750020X
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:jeapmx:v:19:y:2017:i:04:n:s146433321750020x
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
DOI: 10.1142/S146433321750020X
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM) is currently edited by Thomas Fischer
More articles in Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().