Environmental and Policy Insights from a Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Hospital Equipment

Afsana Jerin (), M. A. Parvez Mahmud (), Agnes Michalczyk () and Abbas Z. Kouzani
Additional contact information
Afsana Jerin: School of Engineering, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria 3216, Australia
M. A. Parvez Mahmud: ��School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
Agnes Michalczyk: ��School of Life & Env Sciences Deakin University Burwood, Victoria 3125, Australia
Abbas Z. Kouzani: School of Engineering, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria 3216, Australia

Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), 2025, vol. 27, issue 02, 1-27

Abstract: Across the globe, the healthcare sector has significant impacts on the environment. This study used a comprehensive Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to evaluate the environmental footprints of a variety of types of hospital equipment and consumables in four categories, specifically: reusable instruments, single-use instruments, medical disinfectants, and specimen collection containers. We gathered the required data for the LCA from three sources — Dhaka Medical College Hospital, published literature, and a public database — and analysed it using OpenLCA software. The LCA results show that single-use instruments have higher carbon emissions and terrestrial ecotoxicity than reusable instruments, disinfectants, and containers. Conversely, reusable instruments impact mineral resource scarcity and freshwater ecotoxicity more significantly. The single-use steel laryngoscope handle has the highest greenhouse gas emissions (1.252 kg CO2 eq), while alcohol swabs have the lowest (0.00315 kg CO2 eq). The laparotomy tray shows the highest mineral resource scarcity impact (0.0466 kg Cu eq) and freshwater ecotoxicity (measured at 0.36 kg 1,4-Dichlorobenzene (DCB) equivalents), while alcohol swabs and urine specimen jars have the lowest mineral resource scarcity and freshwater ecotoxicity impacts, respectively. These findings can inform strategies to reduce environmental impacts in healthcare. Based on the findings, the study also proposes actionable policy recommendations to promote sustainable procurement, encourage efficient equipment use, and support environmental accountability in hospital practices.

Keywords: Environmental impact assessment; hospital equipment; life cycle assessment; LCA; hospital consumables (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S146433322550005X
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:jeapmx:v:27:y:2025:i:02:n:s146433322550005x

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

DOI: 10.1142/S146433322550005X

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM) is currently edited by Thomas Fischer

More articles in Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().