EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Organisational Information and Knowledge Sharing: Uncovering Mediating Effects of Perceived Trustworthiness Using the PROCESS Approach

M. Max Evans (), Ilja Frissen and Anthony K. P. Wensley
Additional contact information
M. Max Evans: School of Information Studies, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
Ilja Frissen: School of Information Studies, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
Anthony K. P. Wensley: ICCIT, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, Canada, The J. L. Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), 2018, vol. 17, issue 01, 1-29

Abstract: Many organisations are confronted with challenges in getting employees to effectively participate in information and knowledge sharing (IKS). Further, IKS is embedded in multifaceted social contexts, which are influenced by several different social and cognitive factors. This study is in support of the hypothesis that perceived trustworthiness is widely implicated as a mediating factor between those social–cognitive factors and IKS. Previous work, however, uncovered only a handful of such mediating effects. It is argued here that the paucity may have been due to limitations of the statistical methods. This study employs PROCESS, a more powerful current method for mediation analysis in an attempt to uncover previously hidden relationships. Analyses were performed on data collected from 275 knowledge workers (legal professionals and paralegals) engaged in shared legal project work, at one of Canada’s largest multijurisdictional law firms. Social–cognitive factors that were considered were shared language, shared vision, tie strength, age/gender/educational homophily and relationship length. IKS outcomes were willingness to share, willingness to use and perceived receipt of useful information/knowledge. Consistent with the hypothesis, the more powerful method revealed a large number of significant mediating effects of perceived trustworthiness. Out of possible 112 simple mediation models, 62 were significant, 44 of which had been previously undiscovered. The results highlight the importance of trust as well as the power of current methods for mediation analysis and serve as a strong argument for their use. The paper concludes with implications for research and practice.

Keywords: Trust; perceived trustworthiness; information sharing; knowledge sharing; human factors; mediation analysis; social factors; cognitive factors (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219649218500016
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:jikmxx:v:17:y:2018:i:01:n:s0219649218500016

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

DOI: 10.1142/S0219649218500016

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM) is currently edited by Professor Suliman Hawamdeh

More articles in Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:wsi:jikmxx:v:17:y:2018:i:01:n:s0219649218500016