 INDUSTRIAL POLICY: DON'T ASK WHY, ASK HOWMiddle East Development Journal (MEDJ), 2009, vol. 01, issue 01, 1-29 Abstract: The theoretical case for industrial policy is a strong one. The market failures which industrial policies target — in markets for credit, labor, products, and knowledge — have long been at the core of what development economists study. The conventional case against industrial policy rests on practical difficulties with its implementation. Even though the issues could in principle be settled by empirical evidence, the evidence to date remains uninformative. But the traditional informational and bureaucratic constraints on the exercise of industrial policy are not givens; they can be molded and rendered less binding through appropriate institutional design. Three key design attributes that industrial policy must possess are embeddedness, carrots-and-sticks, and accountability. A review of industrial policy in three non-Asian settings — El Salvador, Uruguay, and South Africa — highlights the extensive amount of industrial policy that is already being carried out and frames the need for industrial policy in the specific circumstances of individual countries. Some implications for the Middle East are discussed. Keywords: Industry; economic growth; policy (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:medjxx:v:01:y:2009:i:01:n:s1793812009000024 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from DOI: 10.1142/S1793812009000024 Access Statistics for this article Middle East Development Journal (MEDJ) is currently edited by Lyn Squire More articles in Middle East Development Journal (MEDJ) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.