Equity Trading in the 21stCentury

James Angel (), Lawrence E. Harris and Chester S. Spatt
Additional contact information
Lawrence E. Harris: Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California, USA
Chester S. Spatt: Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University, USA

Quarterly Journal of Finance (QJF), 2011, vol. 01, issue 01, 1-53

Abstract: The US equity market has changed dramatically in recent years. Increasing automation and the entry of new trading platforms have resulted in intense competition among trading platforms.Despite these changes, traders still face the same challenges as before. They seek to minimize the total cost of trading, including commissions, bid/ask spreads, and market impact. New technologies allow traders to implement traditional strategies more effectively. For example, dark pools and indications of interest are just an updated form of tactics that NYSE (New York Stock Exchange) floor traders used to search for counterparties while minimizing the exposure of their clients' trading interest to prevent front running.Virtually every measurable dimension of US equity market quality has improved. Execution speeds and retail commissions have fallen. Bid-ask spreads have fallen and remain low, although they spiked upward along with volatility during the recent financial crisis. Market depth has increased. Studies of institutional transactions costs find US costs among the lowest in the world. Unlike during the Crash of 1987, the US equity market mechanism handled the increase in trading volume and volatility without disruption. However, our markets lack a market-wide risk management system that would deal with computer-generated chaos in real time, and our regulators should address this."Make or take" pricing, the charging of access fees to market orders that "take" liquidity and paying rebates to limit orders that "make" liquidity, causes distortions that should be corrected. Such charges are not reflected in the quotations used for the measurement of best execution. Direct access by nonbrokers to trading platforms requires appropriate risk management. Front running orders in correlated securities should be banned.

Keywords: Equity markets; market quality; high frequency trading; make-or-take pricing; bid-ask spreads; stock exchanges (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (55)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S2010139211000067
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:qjfxxx:v:01:y:2011:i:01:n:s2010139211000067

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

DOI: 10.1142/S2010139211000067

Access Statistics for this article

Quarterly Journal of Finance (QJF) is currently edited by Fernando Zapatero

More articles in Quarterly Journal of Finance (QJF) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().