Financial Companies’ Failures: Early Warning Information from Systematic and Systemic Risk Measures

Fabrizio Cipollini (), Alessandro Giannozzi, Fiammetta Menchetti () and Oliviero Roggi
Additional contact information
Fabrizio Cipollini: DiSIA, Università di Firenze, Italy
Fiammetta Menchetti: University of Florence, Italy

Quarterly Journal of Finance (QJF), 2018, vol. 08, issue 04, 1-20

Abstract: Following the 2007–2008 financial crisis, advanced risk measures were proposed with the specific aim of quantifying systemic risk, since the existing systematic (market) risk measures seemed inadequate to signal the collapse of an entire financial system. The paper aims at comparing the systemic risk measures and the earlier market risk measures regarding their predictive ability toward the failure of financial companies. Focusing on the 2007–2008 period and considering 28 large US financial companies (among which nine defaulted in the period), four systematic and four systemic risk measures are used to rank the companies according to their risk and to estimate their relationship with the company’s failure through a survival Cox model. We found that the two groups of risk measures achieve similar scores in the ranking exercise, and that both show a significant effect on the time-to-default of the financial institutions. This last result appears even stronger when the Cox model uses, as covariates, the risk measures evaluated one, three and six months before. Considering this last case, the most predictive risk measures about the default risk of financial institutions were the Expected Shortfall, the Value-at-Risk, the CoVaR and the SES.We contribute to the literature in two ways. We provide a way to compare risk measures based on their predictive ability toward a situation, the company’s failure, which is the most catastrophic event for a company. The survival model approach allows to map each risk measure in terms of probability of default over a given time horizon. We note, finally, that although focused on the Great Recession in US, the analysis can be applied to different periods and countries.

Keywords: Systemic risk; regression beta; dynamic conditional beta; value-at-risk; expected shortfall; marginal expected shortfall; systemic expected shortfall; SRISK; CoVaR; Cox proportional hazard model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S2010139218400074
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:qjfxxx:v:08:y:2018:i:04:n:s2010139218400074

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

DOI: 10.1142/S2010139218400074

Access Statistics for this article

Quarterly Journal of Finance (QJF) is currently edited by Fernando Zapatero

More articles in Quarterly Journal of Finance (QJF) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().