Economic Income Versus Accounting Income

Samuel Tung
Additional contact information
Samuel Tung: School of Business, The Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China

Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP), 1998, vol. 01, issue 04, 545-553

Abstract: There is a growing belief that historical-cost accounting is no longer a relevant or reliable means of valuing a firm's assets and liabilities. Economists consider economic income relevant for measuring profit and performance, while they consider accounting income misleading for these purposes. The critical issue of measuring economic income has received little attention. The purpose of this paper is to point out some of the problems involved in computing economic income and to present ways in which accounting income can be adjusted to make it a more viable measurement.

JEL-codes: G1 G2 G3 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1998
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219091598000326
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:rpbfmp:v:01:y:1998:i:04:n:s0219091598000326

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

DOI: 10.1142/S0219091598000326

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP) is currently edited by Cheng-few Lee

More articles in Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().