Balanced Performance Index and Its Implications: Evidence from Taiwan's Commercial Banks
Dar-Yeh Hwang (),
Alice C. Lee (),
Chi-Chun Liu () and
Lishu Ouyang ()
Additional contact information
Dar-Yeh Hwang: Department of Finance, College of Management, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
Alice C. Lee: Finance Department, San Francisco State University, USA
Chi-Chun Liu: Department of Accounting, College of Management, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
Lishu Ouyang: Department of Economics, College of Management, Chinese Culture University, Taipei, Taiwan
Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP), 2009, vol. 12, issue 01, 27-62
Abstract:
Taking into account only financial factors does not provide complete information on performance. This paper takes into consideration of both financial and non-financial performances when evaluating 35 sampled publicly traded commercial banks in Taiwan. The performance of banks is measured using an indexing method consisting of financial and non-financial measures. Banks are classified into two categories according either to the year founded, or to the type of major stockholders of a bank when founded.The results show that privatized government-owned/old banks are larger than private/new banks, respectively. Moreover, privatized government-owned banks have significantly higher financial performance index than private banks but both types of banks are not significantly different from each other in non-financial performance index. New and old banks are not significantly different from each other in both financial and non-financial performance indexes.With relatively large scale, higher profitability and better management, banks will perform relatively better among competitors in the following year. Furthermore, non-financial factors are important predictors of future financial and total performance indexes, though individual factor may not be consistently significant.More branch offices, better capital structure and solvency, and higher rates of growth in deposits and loans all result in more profits, and lead to higher customer satisfaction and more efficient management. Providing better technology to customers is an efficient way in promoting customer services, which in turn produces more profits and results in efficient management. CEOs, on average, have plans for better management and more profits.Among the factors that have direct and positive impacts on profitability, increasing the efficiency of management is the most efficient way. On the contrary, adding more branch offices contributes the least profits. Therefore, to increase bank profits, CEOs should aim to improve bank management, capital structure and solvency, rather than to add more branch offices.
Keywords: Balanced performance measures; performance indexing approach; privatized government-owned bank; CEO leadership; JEL Classification: G21; JEL Classification: G28; JEL Classification: C12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G1 G2 G3 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219091509001538
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:rpbfmp:v:12:y:2009:i:01:n:s0219091509001538
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
DOI: 10.1142/S0219091509001538
Access Statistics for this article
Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP) is currently edited by Cheng-few Lee
More articles in Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().