Factors in Managing Actuarial Assumptions for Pension Fair Value: Implications for IAS 19

Audrey Wen-hsin Hsu (), Chung-Fern Wu () and Jui-Chia Lin
Additional contact information
Audrey Wen-hsin Hsu: Department of Accounting National Taiwan University, 85 Roosevelt Rs. Sec. 4 Taipei, 106, Taiwan
Chung-Fern Wu: Department of Accounting National Taiwan University, 85 Roosevelt Rs. Sec. 4 Taipei, 106, Taiwan
Jui-Chia Lin: Department of Accounting National Taiwan University, 85 Roosevelt Rs. Sec. 4 Taipei, 106, Taiwan

Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP), 2013, vol. 16, issue 01, 1-23

Abstract: Corporate managers make several discretionary assumptions (i.e., the rate of salary growth and assumed return rate of pension plan assets) in calculating the fair value of pension assets and value of pension liabilities. In this study, we examine the factors that can induce managers to increase (decrease) fair value of pension assets (liabilities) through pension assumptions. We use the Taiwan setting as a natural experiment because Taiwan is planning to adopt IFRS from 2013 on. The estimation of pension asset (liability) value is similar between Taiwan accounting standards (i.e., TFAS 18) and international accounting standards (IAS 19); however, fair value is only disclosed in the financial statements under TFAS 18, but is required to be recognized in the balance sheet under IAS 19. The findings under TFAS 18 can provide important implications for future adoption of IAS 19. Using two key inputs for pension pricing model, this study finds that companies are inclined to increase (decrease) the value of pension assets (liabilities) by rising (lowering) the assumed expected rate of asset returns (expected salary growth). The manipulation is more pronounced for firms with high distress risk and complex ownership structure. Prior studies find that once firms are required to recognize the fair value (i.e., adopting IAS 19) as opposed to disclose the information (i.e., TFAS 18), firms have higher incentives to manipulate the model inputs. This suggests that the regulator needs to specify the authoritative enforcement rules regarding fair value estimation, and provides more insights on firms with high distress risk and complex ownership structure.

Keywords: Pension accounting; fair value accounting; IAS 19 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G1 G2 G3 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219091513500021
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:rpbfmp:v:16:y:2013:i:01:n:s0219091513500021

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

DOI: 10.1142/S0219091513500021

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP) is currently edited by Cheng-few Lee

More articles in Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().