Economic Dependence and Reputation Concern for the Audit Firm, Audit Groups, and Individual Auditors — The Case of Taiwan

Pei-Gi Shu (), Tsung-Kang Chen (), Wen-Jye Hung () and Tsui-Lin Chiang ()
Additional contact information
Pei-Gi Shu: Department of Business Administration, Fu Jen Catholic University, No. 510, Jhongjheng Rd., Sinjhuang Dist., New Taipei City 24205, Taiwan
Tsung-Kang Chen: Department of Finance and International Business, Fu Jen Catholic University, No. 510, Jhongjheng Rd., Sinjhuang Dist., New Taipei City 24205, Taiwan
Wen-Jye Hung: Program of Business Administration, Fu Jen Catholic University, No. 510, Jhongjheng Rd., Sinjhuang Dist., New Taipei City 24205, Taiwan
Tsui-Lin Chiang: Program of Business Administration, Fu Jen Catholic University, No. 510, Jhongjheng Rd., Sinjhuang Dist., New Taipei City 24205, Taiwan

Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP), 2013, vol. 16, issue 02, 1-28

Abstract: Using a sample of 3,274 firm-year data from an internationally renowned accounting firm, we investigate the effects of auditor–client relationship on auditor quality (measured by absolute discretionary accruals (ABSDA)) from the perspectives of audit firm, audit group, and individual auditor, respectively. Our empirical results show that after taking account of the client size effect, the client's fee contribution to audit firm and to audit group is positively related to the client firm's ABSDA. The finding that audit firms and audit groups allow their important clients a higher level of ABSDA supports the economic-dependence hypothesis. Moreover, the economic dependence effect is more saliently found prior to the enactment of 2002 Sarbanes–Oxley Act. Furthermore, the other finding that senior individual auditors require their clients a lower level of ABSDA holds the reputation-concern hypothesis. A synopsis of the overall findings indicates that the argument of economic dependence prevails in the analysis of the audit firm and audit group, while the reputation concern prevails in the analysis of the individual auditor.

Keywords: Auditor; auditor–client relationship; economic dependence; reputation concern; M41; M42 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G1 G2 G3 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219091513500124
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:rpbfmp:v:16:y:2013:i:02:n:s0219091513500124

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

DOI: 10.1142/S0219091513500124

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP) is currently edited by Cheng-few Lee

More articles in Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().