ANALYSIS OF THE BRI AND CHINA’S OFDI IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA

Zhikai Wang (), Yangyang Lu (), Simin Zhang () and Engidaw Sisay Negash
Additional contact information
Zhikai Wang: School of Economics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, P. R. China
Yangyang Lu: School of Economics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, P. R. China
Simin Zhang: School of Economics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, P. R. China
Engidaw Sisay Negash: School of Economics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, P. R. China

The Singapore Economic Review (SER), 2024, vol. 69, issue 01, 35-59

Abstract: The “Belt and Road Initiative†(BRI) has been launched by the Chinese government in 2013. The aim was to stimulate cross-border economic development in massive geographical areas covering Asia, Oceania, Europe, Africa, and Latin America which accounts for 80% and 40% of the world population and gross domestic product (GDP), respectively. The BRI has devised an extension of the “going global†strategy to reconfigure China’s overseas sector in order to extend its spillovers, and create more development opportunities for participating countries. In practice, cross-border infrastructure was a comprehensive role to reduce transportation cost; however, the BRI was vast by nature that includes financial support, policy cooperation, investment, trade facilitation, and people-to-people exchanges for the humanitarian strategy. Against this backdrop, the overarching objective of this study was to analyze the impact of the BRI and Chinese outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) on the bilateral trade between China and Sub-Saharan Africa countries. The investigation was carried out using a trade gravity model, balanced panel dataset, and multivariate regression estimation strategy for robustness checks covering 16 years. The result showed that Chinese OFDI, home, and host country’s GDP and GDP per capita income variables have a positive and statistically significant impact on the bilateral trade. Moreover, the BRI has explained positively on the bilateral trade; however, it does not have enough evidence to stimulate significantly, and it usually takes a long time for the effects of the BRI investment on trade and OFDI. The study also found that geographical distance and official exchange rates have explained negatively and statistically significant impact on the bilateral trade.

Keywords: Outward FDI; the Belt and Road Initiative; Sino–Africa Trade; gravity model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F18 F21 F23 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0217590820500496
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:serxxx:v:69:y:2024:i:01:n:s0217590820500496

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

DOI: 10.1142/S0217590820500496

Access Statistics for this article

The Singapore Economic Review (SER) is currently edited by Euston Quah

More articles in The Singapore Economic Review (SER) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().