A KNETSCH PROPOSITION AND A DUE PROCESS FOR THE EVALUATION OF MINING PROJECTS IN ECOLOGICALLY SENSITIVE AREAS: AN ILLUSTRATION THROUGH TWO AUSTRALIAN CASE STUDIES

Ifthikar A. Lodhi () and Dodo J. Thampapillai
Additional contact information
Ifthikar A. Lodhi: School of Global Affairs and Public Policy, The American University in Cairo, New Cairo, 11835, Egypt
Dodo J. Thampapillai: School of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia

The Singapore Economic Review (SER), 2024, vol. 69, issue 04, 1361-1378

Abstract: Drawn on some Knetsch observations, this paper illustrates a due process for the economic evaluation of mining projects that impact sensitive and irreversible ecological assets. Towards this end, two case studies of coal mining projects in Australia are considered — one on the Liverpool Plains in New South Wales and the other on the Galilee Basin in Central Queensland. The adverse environmental and social externalities of these projects are well known — especially the impacts on the Gunnedah and the Great Artesian Basins. Notwithstanding these impacts, which are exceedingly difficult to value, private financial analyses demonstrate significant revenue gains. Mining firms find such gains difficult to ignore. Nevertheless, economic analyses illustrate that the net benefits to Australia are possibly absent even without accounting for the costs of environmental social externalities. Given that the property rights of the mineral reserves are vested with the State, the Resource Rent Tax (RRT) becomes a legitimate fiscal policy tool. The paper argues that the assessment of mining decisions must account for the depreciation of the Mineral asset. When this depreciation is measured alongside the Hartwick–Rule, the mining projects demonstrate monetary viability only when the RRT is enforced and is invested in its entirety on options that generate annual returns in excess of 3% to 4%. If recognized, the costs of environmental and social externalities could readily wipe out this, and for that matter any, monetary viability owing to the irreversible nature of the natural social endowments.

Keywords: Resource rent tax; depreciation of mineral assets; Hartwick–Rule (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0217590823450017
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:serxxx:v:69:y:2024:i:04:n:s0217590823450017

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

DOI: 10.1142/S0217590823450017

Access Statistics for this article

The Singapore Economic Review (SER) is currently edited by Euston Quah

More articles in The Singapore Economic Review (SER) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().