Economics at your fingertips  

Investor Protection and Post-Disclosure Disagreement: International Evidence

Tao Chen ()

The International Journal of Accounting (TIJA), 2022, vol. 57, issue 03, 1-28

Abstract: SynopsisThe research problemAdding to the literature on investor protection, this study investigates whether nationwide institutional features may explain cross-country variation in post-disclosure disagreement.MotivationPrevious research has revealed that the release of financial statements aggravates investor disagreement rather than attenuating it. However, most studies only obtain empirical evidence in the context of the United States; no work has examined this research question in an international setting. Another motivation for this paper is the attempt to understand the contradiction in the literature, which emphasizes micro-level determinants. By contrast, minimal attention has been paid to the macro-level institutional factors of a country’s information environment, which presumably prompts investors to shape heterogeneous beliefs.The test hypothesesH1: Countries with greater corporate transparency are associated with a lower level of post-disclosure investor disagreement.H2: Countries with stronger legal protection are associated with a lower level of post-disclosure investor disagreement.Target populationVarious stakeholders include firm managers, financial analysts, regulatory watchdogs, and users of earnings reports.Adopted methodologyOrdinary Least Squares (OLS) RegressionsAnalysesGao et al. (2012) to measure investor disagreement while we quantify corporate transparency (legal protection) by extracting the first principal component of nine countrywide characteristics pertinent to disclosure requirements (legal systems). Using a global sample from 38 countries, we perform a cross-sectional regression of post-disclosure disagreement on two proxies for investor protection after accounting for firm-specific control variables.FindingsWe find clear evidence of post-disclosure disagreement in all countries. Next, we document a negative relationship between corporate transparency (legal protection) and post-disclosure disagreement. Additional tests confirm that both better disclosures and strong regulations enhance information precision, accelerate information dissemination, and reduce informed trading, thus leading to a lower level of post-disclosure disagreement.

Keywords: Investor protection; disagreement; earnings announcements; cross-country study (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

DOI: 10.1142/S1094406022500123

Access Statistics for this article

The International Journal of Accounting (TIJA) is currently edited by A. Rashad Abdel-khalik

More articles in The International Journal of Accounting (TIJA) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().

Page updated 2022-11-28
Handle: RePEc:wsi:tijaxx:v:57:y:2022:i:03:n:s1094406022500123