The Effect of Time Orientation in Languages on the Recognition of Goodwill Impairment Losses

Ahmad Alshehabi (), Hussein Halabi and Godfred Afrifa ()
Additional contact information
Ahmad Alshehabi: Southampton Business School, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Hussein Halabi: Cardiff Business School, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
Godfred Afrifa: Kent Business School, University of Kent, Kent, UK

The International Journal of Accounting (TIJA), 2023, vol. 58, issue 04, 1-47

Abstract: SynopsisThe research problemIn this study, we investigated the relationship between future-time reference (FTR) in languages and goodwill impairment.MotivationPrevious studies on goodwill have focused mainly on firms’ economic and reporting incentives in single-country settings using economic theories. There have been recent calls for more research on goodwill accounting across countries (d’Arcy and Tarca, 2018), and greater use of behavioral theories in goodwill accounting studies (Amel-Zadeh et al., 2021). In response, we applied the linguistic relativity hypothesis to a new and highly significant area of future-oriented behavior (impairment decision) to explain cross-country variations in goodwill impairment reporting.The test hypothesesWe hypothesized that firms in countries that use weak-FTR languages have higher levels of (and greater quality) goodwill impairment than those in countries that use strong-FTR languages.Target populationWe used a sample of 15,179 firm-year observations taken from firms reporting under IFRS across 21 countries for the fiscal years 2005–2018.Adopted methodologyWe used Tobit regressions, logit regressions, mixed-effects modeling, and propensity score-matching analyses for robustness.AnalysesWe tested the relationship between FTR in languages and (a) goodwill impairment decisions, (b) goodwill impairment amounts, and (c) abnormal goodwill impairments. We repeated our main analyses using several subsamples, different measures of FTR, and alternative regression specifications.FindingsIn line with the linguistic relativity hypothesis, our findings indicate that managers who speak weak-FTR languages are more willing to bear the costs of their impairment decisions in the present and are less motivated to shift current impairment into future accounting periods. In contrast, speakers of strong-FTR languages tend to delay the recognition of current impairments to future periods to reduce their anxiety about the negative effects of current impairment decisions. Findings from further analyses indicate that firms in weak-FTR countries report lower abnormal goodwill impairment, thereby bringing impairment levels closer to their normal optimal levels. Our inferences are robust to alternative samples, different measures of FTR, and alternative model specifications.

Keywords: Goodwill impairment; language; religiosity; culture (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S1094406023500117
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:tijaxx:v:58:y:2023:i:04:n:s1094406023500117

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

DOI: 10.1142/S1094406023500117

Access Statistics for this article

The International Journal of Accounting (TIJA) is currently edited by A. Rashad Abdel-khalik

More articles in The International Journal of Accounting (TIJA) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().