Informal Institutions and Audit Pricing: Cross-Country Evidence of National Culture and Audit Fees

Ammar Gull (), Muhammad Atif () and Muhammad Usman
Additional contact information
Muhammad Atif: College of Business and Law, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia
Muhammad Usman: School of Accounting, Xijing University, Xi’an, P. R. China

The International Journal of Accounting (TIJA), 2024, vol. 59, issue 02, 1-56

Abstract: SynopsisThe research problemIn this study, we examined the effect of an important informal institution, namely, national culture, on audit fees in an international context.MotivationIn recent years, extant literature has increasingly focused on country-level differences in the audit environment, as these might have a significant influence on how financial statement audits are conducted across the globe. We contribute to this stream of literature by investigating the impact of national culture on audit fees.The test hypothesesBased on the demand- and supply-side perspectives of audit fees, we hypothesized that national culture dimensions — namely, uncertainty avoidance, power distance, individualism versus collectivism, and masculinity versus femininity — affect audit fees.Target populationWe used a sample of 27,670 firm-year observations across 22 countries over the 2002–2019 period.Adopted methodologyWe used ordinary least squares (OLS) regressions as baseline technique and entropy-balanced method (EBM) and system-generalized method of moments (GMM) to address endogeneity concerns.AnalysesWe examined the impact of Hofstede’s four national culture dimensions — uncertainty avoidance, power distance, individualism versus collectivism, and masculinity versus femininity — on audit fees. We also tested the robustness of results using alternative measures of national culture, subsample analyses, and additional firm-level factors.FindingsConsistent with our hypotheses, we find that audit fees are higher (lower) in countries with higher uncertainty avoidance, individualism, and masculinity (power distance) scores. Our further analyses reveal that earnings management proxied by abnormal accruals does not impact the relationship; however, country-level creditor rights influence audit fees in high power distance and masculine cultures. We also note that national culture influences auditor choice and audit opinion. Our main findings are robust to alternate proxies and subsample analysis, as well as to address potential endogeneity concerns. Overall, our findings offer important implications for firms operating in global markets and for the audit profession.

Keywords: National culture; audit fees; corporate governance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G12 G15 G33 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S1094406024500082
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:tijaxx:v:59:y:2024:i:02:n:s1094406024500082

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

DOI: 10.1142/S1094406024500082

Access Statistics for this article

The International Journal of Accounting (TIJA) is currently edited by A. Rashad Abdel-khalik

More articles in The International Journal of Accounting (TIJA) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().