Integrated Reporting and the Informativeness of Financial Analysts’ Stock Recommendations

Diogenis Baboukardos and Anastasia Kopita
Additional contact information
Diogenis Baboukardos: Department of Accounting, Management Control & Economics, Audencia Business School, France Department of Accounting & Finance, Athens University of Economics and Business, Greece
Anastasia Kopita: Department of Finance, Accounting and Management Science, Cyprus University of Technology, Cyprus

The International Journal of Accounting (TIJA), 2024, vol. 59, issue 02, 1-58

Abstract: SynopsisThe research problemThe purpose of this study was to examine the market reaction to sell-side analyst recommendation revisions issued under an integrated reporting (IR) approach.MotivationAdvocates of this corporate reporting approach argue that IR enhances capital markets’ information environment by rendering investors better able to assess the value creation process of a firm. Recent empirical studies corroborate this argument. Considering the central role of financial intermediaries, we investigated whether the informativeness of analyst recommendation revisions is associated with the adoption of IR and the quality of integrated reports.The test hypothesesWe tested whether the informativeness of analyst recommendation revisions decreases or increases after the mandatory adoption of an IR approach. Furthermore, we tested whether the informativeness is negatively or positively related to the quality of the released integrated report after the mandatory adoption of an IR approach.Target populationWe focused on the South African capital market, which is the only setting where IR is mandated. We utilized a sample of 3,201 recommendation revisions made within a 3-year window around the mandatory IR adoption.Adopted methodologyThis study used ordinary least square (OLS) regressions and applied difference-in-differences as well as instrumental variable approaches.AnalysesWe modeled the market reaction to the recommendation revisions as a function of the period in which the recommendations are announced (i.e., pre- or post-adoption), along with other factors affecting market reaction. In subsequent tests, we also modeled the market reaction to the recommendation revisions as a function of the quality of a firm’s integrated report.FindingsWe found strong evidence that analysts’ revisions exhibited economically and statistically significantly lower information content under IR. Moreover, we found that upgrades and downgrades issued in the post-adoption period were less informative when issued for firms with high-quality integrated reports. Overall, results showed that the benefit of acquiring advice from analysts became more marginal under an IR approach.

Keywords: Integrated reporting; analysts’ recommendations; market reaction; South Africa (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C10 G14 L15 M41 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S1094406024500094
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wsi:tijaxx:v:59:y:2024:i:02:n:s1094406024500094

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from

DOI: 10.1142/S1094406024500094

Access Statistics for this article

The International Journal of Accounting (TIJA) is currently edited by A. Rashad Abdel-khalik

More articles in The International Journal of Accounting (TIJA) from World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Tai Tone Lim ().