EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Comparison of the Gini and Zenga indexes using some theoretical income distributions abstract

Katarzyna Ostasiewicz () and Edyta Mazurek ()

Operations Research and Decisions, 2013, vol. 23, issue 1, 37-62

Abstract: The most common measure of inequality used in scientific research is the Gini index. In 2007, Zenga proposed a new index of inequality that has all the appropriate properties of an measure of equality. In this paper, we compared the Gini and Zenga indexes, calculating these quantities for the few distributions frequently used for approximating distributions of income, that is, the lognormal, gamma, inverse Gauss, Weibull and Burr distributions. Within this limited examination, we have observed three main differences. First, the Zenga index increases more rapidly for low values of the variation and decreases more slowly when the variation approaches intermediate values from above. Second, the Zenga index seems to be better predicted by the variation. Third, although the Zenga index is always higher than the Gini one, the ordering of some pairs of cases may be inverted.

Keywords: inequality; Gini index; Zenga index (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://ord.pwr.edu.pl/assets/papers_archive/1029%20-%20published.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wut:journl:v:1:y:2013:p:37-62:id:1029

DOI: 10.5277/ord130104

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Operations Research and Decisions from Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Adam Kasperski ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:wut:journl:v:1:y:2013:p:37-62:id:1029