Dimension, egalitarianism and decisiveness of European voting systems

Francesc Carreras (), Josep Freixas () and Antonio Magaña ()

Operations Research and Decisions, 2016, vol. 26, issue 2, 31-52

Abstract: An analysis of three major aspects has been carried out that may apply to any of the successive voting systems used for the European Union Council of Ministers, from the first one established in the Treaty of Rome in 1958 to the current one established in Lisbon. We mainly consider the voting systems designed for the enlarged European Union adopted in the Athens summit, held in April 2003 but this analysis can be applied to any other system. First, it is shown that the dimension of these voting systems does not, in general, reduce. Next, the egalitarian effects of superposing two or three weighted majority games (often by introducing additional consensus) are considered. Finally, the decisiveness of these voting systems is evaluated and compared.

Keywords: voting systems; simple games; weighted majority games; Shapley–Shubik power index; dimension; egalitarianism; decisiveness (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://ord.pwr.edu.pl/assets/papers_archive/1220%20-%20published.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:wut:journl:v:2:y:2016:p:31-52:id:1220

DOI: 10.5277/ord160203

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Operations Research and Decisions from Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Adam Kasperski ().