State financial support for bridge construction of territorial units

Iaroslava Levchenko, Igor Britchenko, Iryna Khoroshylova, Illia Dmytriiev and Oksana Dmytriieva
Additional contact information
Iaroslava Levchenko: Kharkiv National Automobile and Highway University
Igor Britchenko: State Higher Vocational School Memorial of Prof. Stanislaw Tarnowski in Tarnobrzeg
Iryna Khoroshylova: Kharkiv National Automobile and Highway University
Illia Dmytriiev: Kharkiv National Automobile and Highway University
Oksana Dmytriieva: Kharkiv National Automobile and Highway University

Chapter 3 in Problems and prospects of development of the road transport complex: financing, management, innovation, quality, safety – integrated approach, 2021, pp 26-41 from PC TECHNOLOGY CENTER

Abstract: Financial security has always been, is and will be the most painful topic for those who do not have their own funds. This applies to absolutely all sectors of the economy, all industries, all countries. When it comes to large-scale projects, including bridge construction, for Ukrainian realities it becomes a real test. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic challenges, the problem of financial security is particularly acute, especially when it comes to poor regions that are unable to selffinance themselves and survive only on state financial support. Therefore, this section considers the problem of distribution of state financial support on the basis of the integrated approach. The answer to the research question is given: «What components should be included in the methodology for determining state financial support.» The comprehensive method for determining the share of public funds, which takes into account the investment attractiveness of the region and its risk, is proposed. Since the problem of financing the construction and reconstruction of bridges is relevant for a number of countries, this technique was tested on the example of bridge construction. According to the results obtained, the state financial support includes territorial units that are not leaders in priority for an investor and have a high level of risk in investing funds. The integrated approach allowed to identify 10 territorial centers for funding, with the areas with the worst priority indicators receiving the largest share of financial state support.

Keywords: http://monograph.com.ua/pctc/catalog/view/978-617-7319-45-9.ch3/83/338-1 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://monograph.com.ua/pctc/catalog/view/978-617-7319-45-9.ch3/83/338-1 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:baq:pcchap:978-617-7319-45-9-ch3

DOI: 10.15587/978-617-7319-45-9.ch3

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Chapters of Monographs from PC TECHNOLOGY CENTER
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Iryna Prudius ().