Extended Family and Kinship Networks: Economic Insights and Evolutionary Directions
Donald Cox () and
Marcel Fafchamps ()
Chapter 58 in Handbook of Development Economics, 2008, vol. 4, pp 3711-3784 from Elsevier
What do we know about the role of extended families and kinship networks for redistributing resources? What gaps in our knowledge most need to be filled? How can we best organize current work and identify priorities for future research? These questions are important for several reasons: households in developing countries depend on friends and relatives for their livelihood and sometimes their survival; help exchanged within extended families and kin networks affects the distribution of economic well-being, and this private assistance and exchange can interact with public income redistribution. Yet despite rapid recent progress there remain significant deficiencies in our understanding of the economics of extended families. Researchers confront a large and sometimes bewildering array of findings. We review and assess this literature by starting with an emphasis on standard economic concerns, most notably the possible interaction between government-provided social insurance and private kinship networks. Our review of the evidence suggests that the specter of complete "crowding out," whereby introduction or expansion of public transfers merely supplants private transfers, appears quite remote, though not impossible. However, numerous studies do suggest partial - but nonetheless substantial - crowding out, on the order of a 20-to-30-cent reduction in private transfers per dollar increase in public transfers. But the range of estimated effects is exceedingly wide, with many studies suggesting little private transfer response at all. Reconciling and explaining these disparate findings is a priority for future research. Theorizing about the economics of families should move beyond its concentration on income effects. The empirical literature indeed indicates that non-economic variables, such as age and gender, can have a powerful association with private transfers. We suggest that economists tap into the extensive non-economic literature that takes an evolutionary approach to the family. We show that this literature provides valuable guidance for modeling the effects of age, sex and relatedness in the interactions among extended family members. The evolutionary literature has much to offer economists interested in family behavior by proposing novel interpretations of existing findings and pointing out new and fruitful directions for future research. We encourage economists to pay more attention to this approach when studying kinship networks.
Keywords: extended family; kinship network; private transfers; remittances; inter-household transfers; crowding out; risk sharing; Hamilton's rule; cultural norms (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O15 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (37) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B7P5D ... 0bb3fc8783c4bdf9ba13
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:devchp:5-58
Access Statistics for this chapter
More chapters in Handbook of Development Economics from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Catherine Liu ().