Chapter Twenty-Three - Welfarism, Individual Rights, and Procedural Fairness
Chapter 23 in Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, 2011, vol. 2, pp 605-685 from Elsevier
Ever since Sen crystallized the logical conflict between the welfaristic value of the Pareto principle and the nonwelfaristic value of individual libertarian rights into what he christened the impossibility of a Paretian liberal, there have been many attempts in social choice theory to generalize, or to repudiate, the conflict between welfare and rights. This chapter focuses on this logical conflict and tries to find a way of balancing these two important values in human well-being. We will identify three issues in this line of research, viz., the formal articulation of rights, the social realization of rights, and the initial conferment of rights. We will also examine the sustainability of Sen's concept of individual rights and examine the game form articulation of individual rights as a viable alternative to Sen's proposed concept.
Keywords: individual rights; welfarism; normal game form; procedural fairness (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I0 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:socchp:2-23
Access Statistics for this chapter
More chapters in Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare from Elsevier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dana Niculescu ().