 Competition, concentration and critical mass: why the Herfindahl–Hirschman Index is a biased competition measureJ. Bos, Yee Ling Chan, James W. Kolari and Jiang Yuan Chapter 5 in Handbook of Competition in Banking and Finance, 2017, pp 58-88 from Edward Elgar Publishing Abstract: Empirical literature and related legal practice using concentration as a proxy for competition measurement are prone to a fallacy of division, as concentration measures are appropriate for perfect competition and perfect collusion but not intermediate levels of competition. Extending the classic Cournot model used to derive the Hirschman–Herfindahl Index (HHI) of market concentration, we propose an adaptation of this model intended to remove the aggregation bias and omitted variable bias that exist in many empirical studies. Application of our model and new critical mass measures to data for US commercial banks in the period 1984–2013 confirms that concentration measures are indeed unreliable competition metrics. Our results lead us to conclude that critical mass builds upon HHI as a market power metric that incorporates competitive information not contained in HHI. Policy and future research implications are briefly discussed. Keywords: Economics and Finance (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:elg:eechap:16878_5 Ordering information: This item can be ordered from Access Statistics for this chapter More chapters in Chapters from Edward Elgar Publishing |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.