Basic income: Insights from social experiments and simulations

Maximilian Sommer

Chapter 12 in A Research Agenda for Economic Psychology, 2019, pp 169-183 from Edward Elgar Publishing

Abstract: The introduction of an unconditional basic income (UBI) has been a long-lasting debate in most of the modern welfare states. Although it has not yet been implemented anywhere it generates a lot of interest. Independent of its actual implementation, a UBI consists of the idea of a unitary social transfer to everyone in society, replacing many if not all existing transfers. This new transfer is no longer means tested. Hence, it is not subject to the household situation or even the willingness to work. The arguments for this include an increase in social justice, a reduction of poverty, and a raise in individual freedom. The arguments against focus mainly around the abandonment of the subsidiarity principle. Critics also fear that an unconditional payment would reduce labour market participation especially for low-income households. Furthermore, given the nature of a negative income tax scheme, full poverty extinction combined with high incentives to work could not be financed.

Keywords: Economics and Finance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781788116053/9781788116053.00017.xml (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 503 Service Temporarily Unavailable

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:elg:eechap:18159_12

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.e-elgar.com

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Chapters from Edward Elgar Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Darrel McCalla ().