The politics of Citizens Basic Income
.
Chapter 11 in A Modern Guide to Citizen’s Basic Income, 2020, pp 198-230 from Edward Elgar Publishing
Abstract:
In Chapter 11, each of liberalism, socialism, and conservatism, is found to provide grounds for arguments for Citizen’s Basic Income, and proponents of each ideology are found to have offered arguments for it. Arguments against are found to be not ideology-specific. The chapter recognises that ideological pressures can result in policy compromises and complexity, but that Citizen’s Basic Income is uncompromisable because it has a clear definition. Citizen’s Basic Income schemes – with funding mechanisms and the levels of Citizen’s Basic Income for different age groups specified – are however subject to ideological pressures. The chapter discusses poverty, inequality, redistribution of income, and redistribution of the ability to raise net disposable income; and it contains discussions of citizenship rights, citizenship duties, our diverse citizenship, and Citizen’s Basic Income’s effects on citizenship. A case study describes reductions in poverty and inequality that two Citizen’s Basic Income schemes would achieve.
Keywords: Economics and Finance; Politics and Public Policy Social Policy and Sociology (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.elgaronline.com/view/9781788117869.00019.xml (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 503 Service Temporarily Unavailable
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:elg:eechap:18257_11
Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.e-elgar.com
Access Statistics for this chapter
More chapters in Chapters from Edward Elgar Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Darrel McCalla ().