Critical policy argumentation in Covid controversies: From statistics to political values

.

Chapter 4 in Critical Policy Inquiry, 2024, pp 65-84 from Edward Elgar Publishing

Abstract: This chapter illustrates the logic of critical policy argumentation with the case of Covid-19 policy. After a discussion of the role of numbers in policy analysis, the analysis shows that all of the arguments offered for and against Covid policy interventions can be located across the four levels of policy argumentation. Despite the importance of the empirical data, the analysis illustrates how the controversies surrounding the policy measures cannot be resolved with statistics alone. To understand the nature of Covid policy arguments, the statistical results need to be interpretively situated in the relevant social and political contexts. This is demonstrated by showing how Covid information takes on meaning in situational, systemic, and ideological contexts that characterize the discursive realm. The chapter concludes with a discussion of the way policy deliberation and social learning can assist Covid policymaking.

Keywords: Politics; and; Public; Policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.elgaronline.com/doi/10.4337/9781789900811.00010 (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 503 Service Temporarily Unavailable

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:elg:eechap:18947_4

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.e-elgar.com

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Chapters from Edward Elgar Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Darrel McCalla ().