Ideal theory and the basic structure

.

Chapter 2 in Neoliberal Social Justice, 2021, pp 21-35 from Edward Elgar Publishing

Abstract: Is a conception of justice restricted to institutions adequately ideal? Rawls argues that a basic structure of key social institutions is the site of distributive justice. G. A. Cohen observes that Rawls’ distinction between the basic structure and the rest of civil society is premised on a somewhat self-interested conception of human nature. Rawls seems to accept personal behaviour that produces morally arbitrary inequalities even in ideal theory. Cohen believes that this is an impoverished ideal of justice which should instead be based on an egalitarian ethos that evaluates personal conduct as well as background institutions. Using a parallel model to the prisoners’ dilemma, called the Gift of the Magi, I distinguish Cohen’s concern with self-interest from a more general problem of achieving social coordination even among people of goodwill. This justifies a basic structure without presuming any degree of moral fallibility.

Keywords: Economics and Finance; Politics and Public Policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.elgaronline.com/view/9781800374539.00008.xml (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 503 Service Temporarily Unavailable

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:elg:eechap:20140_2

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.e-elgar.com

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Chapters from Edward Elgar Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Darrel McCalla ().