Knowledge, not incentives

.

Chapter 3 in Neoliberal Social Justice, 2021, pp 36-46 from Edward Elgar Publishing

Abstract: How useful is an egalitarian ethos in facilitating social cooperation in a political community? Both G.A. Cohen and David Estlund offer thought experiments to argue for the importance of personal motivation and commitment for achieving fair and just outcomes. I challenge these conclusions and offer parallel examples which illustrate how personal motivation and commitment, at the scale of a political community, are practically enveloped by knowledge and coordination problems. Our capacity to cooperate with fairness at scale is limited primarily by our cognitive capacities rather than lack of goodwill towards others. Distributive justice is established and stably reproduced through our conduct as democratic citizens within a basic structure of institutions. Uncoordinated personal conduct cannot make a practical contribution. Moreover, my argument can be rendered as a fact-insensitive principle in line with Cohen’s conceptual framework.

Keywords: Economics and Finance; Politics and Public Policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.elgaronline.com/view/9781800374539.00009.xml (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 503 Service Temporarily Unavailable

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:elg:eechap:20140_3

Ordering information: This item can be ordered from
http://www.e-elgar.com

Access Statistics for this chapter

More chapters in Chapters from Edward Elgar Publishing
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Darrel McCalla ().